Falcon Secure Trunk Communications System

Lord Drayson: My right honourable friend the Minister of State for the Armed Forces (Adam Ingram) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	Today, I am pleased to announce that BAe Systems Insyte has been selected as the preferred bidder for the Falcon Secure Trunk Communication System (Increment A). The Ministry of Defence will now enter detailed negotiations with BAe Systems Insyte to determine the basis for the main investment decision, at which point cost and formal in-service date will be set.
	Falcon is one of the key equipment capabilities at the heart of our drive to develop network enabled capability and will provide advanced communication capabilities suitable for our Armed Forces in the 21st century.
	Work on Falcon will also underpin British industry's position at the forefront of communications technology worldwide.

Fuel Duties

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My honourable friend the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (John Healey) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The Chancellor of the Exchequer announced in the Budget that, owing to the sustained volatility in the oil market, the annual inflation-only increase in main fuel duties would be deferred until 1 September.
	Following sustained pressure from G8 finance ministers, OPEC has committed to increasing quotas by up to 1 million barrels a day by September.
	But in the short-term uncertainty, and the risk of price volatility, remains high, with oil trading last week at above $59 per barrel.
	The Government will not go ahead with the planned inflation increase on 1 September—including for rebated oils, biofuels and road fuel gases—and will review the position again at the time of the Pre-Budget Report.

Government Chemist

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: My right honourable friend the Minister of State for Energy (Malcolm Wicks) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The eighth annual review of the Government Chemist has been received. The review will be laid before the Scottish Parliament and copies will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses plus those of the devolved administrations in Wales, and Northern Ireland.

HM Revenue and Customs: Prosecutions

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My honourable friend the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (John Healey) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In light of the judgments by Mr Justice Crane in the case of Operation Venison on 24 June and by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Operation Hellvellyn and others on 4 July, I am announcing today that HMRC has agreed with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) that it will oversee an investigation into the criticism in Mr Justice Crane's judgment of actions of individual officers in Operation Venison.
	I can also announce that HM Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) will begin in September a full programme of inspection to examine informant handling, controlled deliveries and disclosure, including the issues raised in the judgments of Operation Venison and Operation Hellvellyn and others.
	At the same time, the director of the independent Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office (RCPO) is examining whether or not other cases may be affected by the court judgments.
	The Government take the criticisms of HMRC and HMRC officers contained in the Venison and Hellvelyn judgments very seriously. We are committed to ensuring that the issues raised in such cases are fully investigated.
	For this reason, and to ensure that HMRC systems and practice match the best standards of law enforcement elsewhere, I can confirm that since I informed the House on 29 September 2004 of our intention to establish independent scrutiny arrangements for HMRC following the report of Mr Justice Butterfield, the Government have legislated to:
	establish an independent Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office, accountable directly to the Attorney-General;
	extend the remit of the Independent Police Complaints Commission to allow investigation of serious complaints and allegations against HMRC staff; and
	extend the remit of HM Inspectorate of Constabulary to investigate HMRC's law-enforcement procedures and practice.
	The IPCC-led investigation and the HMIC inspection that I am announcing today are the first use of this comprehensive, independent scrutiny framework. These newly-legislated arrangements with the IPCC, HMIC and RCPO mean HMRC is now served by a fully independent prosecutions office and is being made subject to the same standards of independent scrutiny, inspection and complaints investigation as are already established for the police.
	This framework for external scrutiny goes further than Justice Butterfield's recommendations, so that HMRC and Ministers are empowered to ensure the independent, timely and expert investigation of problems arising in serious criminal cases. Where appropriate in such cases, we will make use of these arrangements in the future.

Lord Goldsmith: I refer to the Statement made today by my honourable friend Mr Healey, the Financial Secretary, concerning Operation Venison and Operation Hellvellyn and others.
	In the light of criticisms made of a prosecutor in Operation Venison, the director of the independent Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office (RCPO) has removed that person from operational duty. In addition the director is urgently considering whether any other cases may be affected by the Venison judgment.

Independent Mental Capacity Advocate

Lord Warner: My honourable friend the Minister of State (Rosie Winterton) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am announcing today the publication of the consultation on the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate service.
	During the passage of the Mental Capacity Bill Ministers committed to consulting with interested stakeholders on the operation and details of the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) service. This new service was introduced in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to support and represent the most vulnerable people who lack capacity in serious decisions about medical treatment and accommodation.
	The consultation document Consultation on the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate service, covers operational and implementation details, the role and functions of the IMCA, definitions of serious medical treatment and options on whether to extend the service to other groups and situations. The consultation will inform implementation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 planned for April 2007.
	The consultation will run until 30 September 2005 and applies to England only. Copies of the consultation paper and the accessible version have been placed in the Library and are also available from the department's website at www.dh.gov.uk.

Legal Aid

Lord Falconer of Thoroton: I have today published a paper outlining the government proposals to reform the provision of legal aid in England and Wales.
	Legal aid is one of the cornerstones of a fair and decent society. It provides the means to guarantee that all citizens can enforce their rights and are held accountable for fulfilling their responsibilities; it ensures that people accused of a crime get a proper defence; and safeguards vulnerable and disadvantaged people so they are not denied access to justice because of their inability to pay for it.
	The paper, A Fairer Deal for Legal Aid, analyses the development of legal aid services, including the substantial increase in spending on legal aid in criminal cases at the expense of civil law cases. The paper sets out the Government's vision for legal aid, based on a system that:
	provides advice and representation to defendants, in a way that is proportionate to the issues at stake;
	supports the objectives of the criminal justice system, by helping to ensure timely and effective procedures and trials; and
	provides a more effective service for people involved in civil disputes.
	The Government will take steps to address the disproportionate amount of money spent on defending high-cost criminal cases and redistribute funding so that all criminal cases are dealt with swiftly and fairly and ensure greater flexibility to provide more civil help and advice to those who need it. This will include:
	tougher judicial management of larger, complex cases;
	a new review board, with members from across the criminal justice system, to examine previous cases and identify improvements for the future;
	better management of large volumes of evidence—including better use of technology;
	a comprehensive review of how fraud cases are brought to justice;
	closer co-operation between the defence and prosecution in the police station;
	letting defendants know their sentence discount, should they plead guilty; and
	an independent review by Lord Carter of Coles, which will produce a plan by early 2006 identifying how to improve procurement of publicly funded legal services.
	Copies of the paper have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses. It is also available on the Department for Constitutional Affairs' website at www.dca.gov.uk.

NHS Foundation Trusts

Lord Warner: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Health has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The Healthcare Commission (the statutory name of which is the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection) has today published the outcome of a review of National Health Service foundation trusts, copies of which are available in the Library.
	The review was commissioned by the then Secretary of State for Health (Dr Reid) on 19 November 2003 (Official Report, House of Commons, col. 826) and has examined the experiences, challenges and issues for those trusts that became NHS foundation trusts on 1 April 2004 and 1 July 2004. In particular, the review considered the effects that NHS foundation trusts had on access to and quality of healthcare and relationships within local health economies, and the impact of the new governance arrangements and obstacles faced by NHS foundation trusts.
	The outcome of the review is encouraging. I am pleased that NHS foundation trusts have made a good start to providing better quality services to NHS patients. While it is early days, NHS foundation trusts are making good progress in developing new services and improving accountability. The Healthcare Commission review found that NHS foundation trusts have:
	increased the ability to plan and develop new services and improve accountability to their local populations;
	used their financial freedoms to gain access to capital investment and make quicker decisions to accelerate improvements to services, for example, offering specialist services in the community;
	increased local public and patient involvement by successfully recruiting members and electing members to the boards; mostly maintained their finances well within a more rigorous framework of financial management;
	maintained standards of care in terms of access to and quality of care; and
	maintained positive relationships with local commissioners and other local providers.
	I also welcome the fact that some of the concerns about NHS foundation trusts have not materialised, for example NHS foundation trusts:
	have not destabilised local health services, for example by using unfair competition to attract staff;
	have not "cherry picked" patients who are easier to treat;
	have continued to invest in staff education and training; and
	have in the majority of cases continued to work in partnership with other NHS services and organisations in the local health community.
	There is much we can learn as we move forward with change that is centred on making NHS services more responsive to the needs of NHS patients in the 21st century.
	I should like to thank the Healthcare Commission for conducting this thorough review and producing its report to a short timetable. The introduction of NHS foundation trusts changes greatly the way in which healthcare is managed and delivered through the NHS. Such trusts are designed to sustain, not displace, the core NHS principles of universality and equity, with access based on clinical need and free at the point of use. The Government will also consider fully the lessons from this review for the continuing development of NHS foundation trusts.